Both mappers read that field through a hardcoded list of keys — hostname, process.cmd_line, parent_process.*, user — taken from the one alert this work was built against, a process_start_event detection. Every entry is a JSONata predicate on an exact key, so a rule emitting anything else matches none of them. A real alert from a second tenant showed what that costs. It is a custom ingress_auth rule, and its keys are: account locuz_hma@totogroup.net source_ip 183.82.103.101 geoip_country_code IN result SUCCESS Not one appears in the hardcoded list. The alert was fetched, inlined and mapped, and produced an incident as empty as the ones this integration set out to fix — with the account and the source IP sitting in the payload, unread. Two changes: - The whole list is flattened verbatim into `detection`, and rule_matching_keys into `detection_match`. Keys nobody anticipated now arrive intact, and they reach the AI analysis, which reads the mapped context and never `raw`. - account, source_ip, destination_ip, geoip_country_code and result gain explicit OCSF entries. The explicit mappings are not redundant with the flattening: a value under `detection.` is only ever seen by the IOC regex, so an account there would be indexed as an email, or not at all, rather than as a user. Typing an entity correctly still requires naming its field. evidences[] carries the flattened keys too, so the same holds for the second and third alert of an investigation, not only the first. Verified against both rule shapes end to end. The process rule yields the two hosts it did before; the authentication rule now yields the source IP and the account, where it previously yielded nothing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Riposte Marketplace
Official catalog of integrations for the Riposte SOAR platform.
Riposte syncs this repository (a "git source") and lists every integration it finds so operators can install them in one click. Nothing here is executed at sync time — Riposte only reads manifests and scripts.
How discovery works
When Riposte syncs a source it does a shallow git clone of the selected branch
and walks the whole tree looking for files named exactly manifest.yaml.
- Each
manifest.yamlis one integration. Its containing directory is the package root. Put one integration per directory. - Scripts are collected from the package directory and its
scripts/subdirectory: every*.pyfile becomes a command implementation, keyed by filename without the extension. So a command withid: get_ip_reportis backed byget_ip_report.py. - Files not named
manifest.yamlare ignored as integration roots, so templates likemanifest.example.yamlare never ingested.
integrations/
└── <integration-id>/
├── manifest.yaml # required — the integration definition
└── scripts/ # optional — only for script-based commands
└── <command-id>.py
Manifest schema (manifest.yaml)
id: my_integration # required, unique, slug
name: My Integration # required, human name
version: 1.0.0 # semver
description: What it does.
changelog: "1.1.0 — notes" # optional: shown on update so operators can assess risk
category: enrichment # free text (enrichment, containment, ticketing…)
# Per-instance configuration the operator fills when creating an instance.
# JSON-Schema shape: { properties: {...}, required: [...] }.
config_schema:
properties:
base_url:
type: string # string | number | boolean
description: API base URL
default: https://api.example.com/v1
api_key:
type: string
description: API key
x-soar-sensitive: true # stored encrypted in the vault, never returned
required:
- api_key
# Authentication methods, referenced by commands via `auth_ref`.
auth:
- id: apikey
type: api_key # api_key | bearer | basic | oauth2_client_credentials
in: header # header | query
name: x-apikey # header/query parameter name
value_template: "{{secret}}" # {{secret}} is replaced by the secret_field value
secret_field: api_key # which config_schema field holds the secret
commands:
# --- Request-based command (recommended, no code) -----------------------
- id: get_ip_report
name: Get IP report
description: Reputation for an IP address.
inputs_schema:
properties:
ip:
type: string
description: IP address to look up
required:
- ip
outputs_schema:
properties: {}
request:
method: GET # GET | POST | PUT | PATCH | DELETE
path: /ip/{ip} # {ip} is filled from inputs
query: [] # input names sent as query params
body: [] # input names sent as JSON body fields
auth_ref: apikey
# --- Script-based command -----------------------------------------------
# Omit `request` and provide scripts/<id>.py instead. The script receives the
# resolved inputs + instance config and MUST print one JSON object to stdout.
- id: enrich_custom
name: Custom enrichment
description: Runs scripts/enrich_custom.py in a sandbox.
inputs_schema:
properties:
indicator:
type: string
required:
- indicator
outputs_schema:
properties: {}
A command is request-based when it has a request: block, or
script-based when a matching scripts/<command-id>.py exists. Prefer
request-based commands: they need no sandbox and are easier to audit.
Adding this catalog to Riposte
In Riposte → Integrations → Marketplace → Add source:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Official marketplace |
| Git URL | https://gitea.riposte-labs.com/f3nris/riposte-marketplace.git |
| Branch | main |
| Provider | Gitea (sets the right auth scheme for private repos) |
| Token | a read-only token if the repo is private; leave empty if public |
Then Sync. Discovered integrations appear in the marketplace, ready to install.
Contributing an integration
- Create
integrations/<id>/manifest.yaml(one directory per integration). - Add
scripts/<command-id>.pyonly for script-based commands. - Bump
version(semver) on every change — Riposte tracks versions per source. - Validate the YAML parses and
id/nameare set. - Open a merge request.
See templates/manifest.example.yaml for a
fully-commented starting point (that file is intentionally not ingested).